TX5200m VS TX5823 200mW VTX
Videos comparing two 200mW VTX i) the TX2800m and the ii) TX5823.
I used a pololu to step down the voltage to 3.3V from a 2S LiPo battery.
I also use two PAL camera with 170 degrees of FOV : the i) MC495A-170 and the ii) MC91AB18
IMHO, the T5200m is better than the TX5823 by outputing a more stronger and clean signal. The TX5823 is more sensitive to interferences as showed with the MC91AB18 camera. For me the best couple is the MC91AB18 camera with the T58000 VTX offering a very sharp image. If you have already the TX5823, I would advice to take more the MC495A-170
TX5800 :
TX5823 :
MC495A-170 :
MC91AB18 :
Pololu voltage regulator :
LC filter :
I used a pololu to step down the voltage to 3.3V from a 2S LiPo battery.
I also use two PAL camera with 170 degrees of FOV : the i) MC495A-170 and the ii) MC91AB18
IMHO, the T5200m is better than the TX5823 by outputing a more stronger and clean signal. The TX5823 is more sensitive to interferences as showed with the MC91AB18 camera. For me the best couple is the MC91AB18 camera with the T58000 VTX offering a very sharp image. If you have already the TX5823, I would advice to take more the MC495A-170
TX5800 :
TX5823 :
MC495A-170 :
MC91AB18 :
Pololu voltage regulator :
LC filter :
Rcreviews.lt is not the owner of this text/video/image/photo content, the real source of content is Youtube.com and user declared in this page publication as Youtube.com user,
if you have any question about video removal, what was shared by open community, please contact Youtube.com directly or report bad/not working video links directly to video owner on Youtube.com. Removed video from Youtube.com will also be removed from here.
Advertising